Few relationships are as important to stability in Asia as the one
between Japan and South Korea. Yet Japan’s new prime minister, Shinzo
Abe, seems inclined to start his tenure with a serious mistake that
would inflame tensions with South Korea and make cooperation harder. He has signaled
that he might seek to revise Japan’s apologies for its World War II
aggression, including one for using Koreans and other women as sex
slaves.
In 1993,
Japan finally acknowledged that the Japanese military had raped and
enslaved thousands of Asian and European women in army brothels, and
offered its first full apology for those atrocities. A broader apology
by Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama in 1995
conceded that “through its colonial rule and invasion,” Japan had
caused “tremendous damage and suffering to the people of many countries,
particularly to those of Asian nations.”
In an interview with the Sankei Shimbun newspaper, Mr. Abe, a right-wing
nationalist, was quoted by Reuters on Monday as saying he wants to
replace the 1995 apology with an unspecified “forward looking
statement.” He said that his previous administration, in 2006-7, had
found no evidence that the women who served as sex slaves to Japan’s
wartime military had, in fact, been coerced. However, at a news
conference last week, the chief cabinet secretary, Yoshihide Suga, said
that Mr. Abe would uphold the 1995 apology but hinted he may revise the
1993 statement.
It is not clear how Mr. Abe, the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party
of Japan, might modify the apologies, but he has previously made no
secret of his desire to rewrite his country’s wartime history. Any
attempt to deny the crimes and dilute the apologies will outrage South
Korea, as well as China and the Philippines, which suffered under
Japan’s brutal wartime rule.
Mr. Abe’s shameful impulses could threaten critical cooperation in the
region on issues like North Korea’s nuclear weapons program. Such
revisionism is an embarrassment to a country that should be focused on
improving its long-stagnant economy, not whitewashing the past.